§ evidence · vol.01
felt duration and clock duration are not the same measurement.
Twelve references. Each one is a real paper, checked against Crossref for authors, title, venue, year and pages, with a link that resolves. If a source could not be verified it is not on this page.
one tile = one reference12 verified · 0 unverified
§ 01
the internal clock
scalar timing
The standard account of how animals and people time an interval: a pacemaker emits pulses, a switch lets them into an accumulator, and the count is compared against memory. Its signature prediction is that timing error scales with the interval — so uncertainty grows the longer you wait.
-
Gibbon · 1977
Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing
Psychological Review, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 279–325 · doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.279
The founding statement of scalar expectancy theory, and of the idea that timing variability is proportional to the duration being timed.
-
Gibbon, Church & Meck · 1984
Scalar timing in memory
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 423, no. 1, pp. 52–77 · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23417.x
Sets out the pacemaker–accumulator information-processing model that most later work on interval timing argues with or builds on.
-
Merchant, Harrington & Meck · 2013
Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time
Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 313–336 · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170349
A review of where timing lives in the brain, and of why no single dedicated clock organ accounts for the range of durations people handle.
§ 02
attention, arousal and the length of a stretch
where the drift comes from
Duration is not read off a dial. How long something felt depends on how much attention was pointed at time itself, on arousal, and on the state of the body while it passed.
-
Block & Zakay · 1997
Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: a meta-analytic review
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 184–197 · doi:10.3758/BF03209393
Across twenty experiments, knowing in advance that you will be asked how long something took changes the answer: prospective judgements run longer and vary less than remembered ones.
-
Seifried & Ulrich · 2010
Exogenous visual attention prolongs perceived duration
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 68–85 · doi:10.3758/s13414-010-0005-6
Drawing attention to a stimulus makes its duration feel longer — a direct demonstration that attention is part of the measurement.
-
Droit-Volet & Meck · 2007
How emotions colour our perception of time
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 504–513 · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.008
Reviews how arousal and emotional valence push perceived duration in opposite directions, by changing both clock speed and attention to time.
-
Wittmann · 2009
The inner experience of time
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 364, no. 1525, pp. 1955–1967 · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0003 · open access
Argues that bodily and emotional states are not a distortion applied to duration but part of how duration is encoded in the first place.
§ 03
timing in ADHD
two meta-analyses
The strongest claim on this page, because it rests on pooled evidence rather than single studies: the divergence between felt and measured duration is larger and more consistent in ADHD.
-
Marx, Cortese, Koelch & Hacker · 2022
Meta-analysis: altered perceptual timing abilities in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 866–880 · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2021.12.004
Pools 55 studies of time discrimination, estimation, production and reproduction. Differences are clearest for very brief durations, and the authors read the estimation and production results as consistent with a faster-running internal clock.
-
Zheng, Wang, Chiu & Shum · 2022
Time perception deficits in children and adolescents with ADHD: a meta-analysis
Journal of Attention Disorders, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 267–281 · doi:10.1177/1087054720978557
27 studies, 1,620 participants with ADHD against 1,249 controls. Timing is less accurate and less precise, with a tendency to overestimate intervals, and the effect holds across task type and stimulus modality.
Worth stating plainly: these are group differences in laboratory tasks, not a diagnostic test, and neither paper studied a timer app. They support the premise that a clock is a poor instrument for felt duration. They do not measure whether this one helps.
§ 04
the body's own drift
circadian
-
Aschoff · 1998
Human perception of short and long time intervals: its correlation with body temperature and the duration of wake time
Journal of Biological Rhythms, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 437–442 · doi:10.1177/074873098129000264
In subjects isolated from all time cues, produced intervals of five and ten seconds tracked body temperature, while produced hours tracked how long the person had been awake — evidence that short and long durations are not timed by the same mechanism.
§ 05
how clock time was standardised
coordination, not experience
Uniform clock time is a nineteenth-century administrative achievement. It was pushed through to make timetables, shifts and telegraph signals agree with each other.
-
Thompson · 1967
Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism
Past & Present, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 56–97 · doi:10.1093/past/38.1.56 · jstor.org/stable/649749
The classic account of the shift from task-oriented work to clock-oriented work, and of time-discipline as something taught rather than natural.
-
Bartky · 1989
The adoption of standard time
Technology and Culture, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 25 · doi:10.2307/3105430
How standard time actually came in — driven by railway and telegraph coordination rather than by any improvement in how people experience an afternoon.
Two further histories, and the horological lineage of measuring duration by scent and by flame, are on the learning page.
How these were checked
Every reference above was resolved through the Crossref API by DOI, and the authors, title, venue, year, volume, issue and pages printed here were taken from what Crossref returned rather than from memory. Every link was then requested and confirmed to resolve.
Two links point somewhere other than the publisher's DOI landing page, because those two publishers refuse automated requests and a link that cannot be checked is not a verified link: Wittmann is linked to its open-access copy at PubMed Central, and Thompson to its JSTOR record. Both DOIs are printed in full beside them.
Candidate sources that could not be verified were dropped rather than reworded. A fabricated reference on a page like this would be worse than no page at all.